E. Zaustinsky, “Are Equalized Closed-Boxes Preferable to Vented-Boxes?” in Proc. AES Convention 81, Nov. 1986, Paper 2415. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=5015
Zaustinsky E. Are Equalized Closed-Boxes Preferable to Vented-Boxes? In: AES Convention 81. Audio Engineering Society; 1986. Paper 2415. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=5015
@inproceedings{Zaustinsky1986_5015,
author = {Zaustinsky, Eugene},
title = {{Are Equalized Closed-Boxes Preferable to Vented-Boxes?}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 81},
note = {Paper 2415},
year = {1986},
month = nov,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=5015}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Are Equalized Closed-Boxes Preferable to Vented-Boxes?
AU - Zaustinsky, Eugene
T2 - AES Convention 81
M1 - Paper 2415
PY - 1986
DA - 1986/11/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=5015
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Any response, which can be achieved by a vented-box, can also be realized by an equalized closed-box. The resulting excursion functions, however, will be different. The tradeoffs, between these two design concepts, are examined. The problems of closed-box equalizer design, given the spectral content of the signal to be reproduced is studied.
ER -