Evaluating AVAR: Goodbye Quality, Hello Plausibility?

Rumsey F. Evaluating AVAR: Goodbye Quality, Hello Plausibility? J Audio Eng Soc. 2018;66(12):1126-1130. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19882

@article{Rumsey2018_19882,
  author = {Rumsey, Francis},
  title = {{Evaluating AVAR: Goodbye Quality, Hello Plausibility?}},
  journal = {Journal of the Audio Engineering Society},
  volume = {66},
  number = {12},
  pages = {1126--1130},
  year = {2018},
  month = dec,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19882}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating AVAR: Goodbye Quality, Hello Plausibility?
AU  - Rumsey, Francis
T2  - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
J2  - J. Audio Eng. Soc.
VL  - 66
IS  - 12
SP  - 1126
EP  - 1130
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/12/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19882
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - [Feature] There are many more variables and context dependencies in evaluating AVAR systems than there are in conventional audio reproduction systems. This makes the determination of things like references rather hard, with attention being focused on alternative approaches more to do with quality of experience than audio quality per se. The concept of plausibility arises regularly here, as does the idea of looking at how users behave or what they can identify. When natural and synthetic elements are combined in AR there is a need to ensure a high degree of co-immersion and to find ways of evaluating that.
ER  -