M. Generale, R. King, and D. Martin, “A Comparison of Clarity in MQA Encoded Files vs. Their Unprocessed State as Performed by Three Groups – Expert Listeners,” in Proc. AES Convention 144, May 2018, Paper 10000. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19396
Generale M, King R, Martin D. A Comparison of Clarity in MQA Encoded Files vs. Their Unprocessed State as Performed by Three Groups – Expert Listeners. In: AES Convention 144. Audio Engineering Society; 2018. Paper 10000. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19396
@inproceedings{Generale2018_19396,
author = {Generale, Mariane and King, Richard and Martin, Denis},
title = {{A Comparison of Clarity in MQA Encoded Files vs. Their Unprocessed State as Performed by Three Groups – Expert Listeners}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 144},
note = {Paper 10000},
year = {2018},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19396}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - A Comparison of Clarity in MQA Encoded Files vs. Their Unprocessed State as Performed by Three Groups – Expert Listeners
AU - Generale, Mariane
AU - King, Richard
AU - Martin, Denis
T2 - AES Convention 144
M1 - Paper 10000
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19396
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - This paper aims to examine perceived clarity in MQA encoded audio files compared to their unprocessed state (96-kHz 24-bit). Utilizing a methodology initially proposed by the authors in a previous paper, this study aims to investigate any reported differences in clarity for three musical sources of varying genres. A double-blind test is conducted using three groups—expert listeners, musicians, and casual listeners—in a controlled environment using high-quality loudspeakers and headphones. The researchers were interested in comparing the responses of the three target groups and whether playback systems had any significant effect on listeners’ perception. Data shows that listeners were not able to significantly discriminate between MQA encoded files and the unprocessed original due to several interaction effects.
ER -