J. Wakefield and C. Dewey, “An Investigation into the Efficacy of Methods Commonly Employed by Mix Engineers to Reduce Frequency Masking in the Mixing of Multitrack Musical Recordings,” in Proc. AES Convention 138, May 2015, Paper 9341. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17765
Wakefield J, Dewey C. An Investigation into the Efficacy of Methods Commonly Employed by Mix Engineers to Reduce Frequency Masking in the Mixing of Multitrack Musical Recordings. In: AES Convention 138. Audio Engineering Society; 2015. Paper 9341. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17765
@inproceedings{Wakefield2015_17765,
author = {Wakefield, Jonathan and Dewey, Christopher},
title = {{An Investigation into the Efficacy of Methods Commonly Employed by Mix Engineers to Reduce Frequency Masking in the Mixing of Multitrack Musical Recordings}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 138},
note = {Paper 9341},
year = {2015},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17765}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - An Investigation into the Efficacy of Methods Commonly Employed by Mix Engineers to Reduce Frequency Masking in the Mixing of Multitrack Musical Recordings
AU - Wakefield, Jonathan
AU - Dewey, Christopher
T2 - AES Convention 138
M1 - Paper 9341
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17765
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Studio engineers use a variety of techniques to reduce frequency masking between instruments when mixing multitrack musical recordings. This study evaluates the efficacy of three techniques, namely mirrored equalization, frequency spectrum sharing, and stereo panning against their variations to confirm the veracity of accepted practice. Mirrored equalization involves boosting one instrument and cutting the other at the same frequency. Frequency spectrum sharing involves low pass filtering one instrument and high pass filtering the other. Panning involves placing two competing instruments at different pan positions. Test subjects used eight tools comprising a single unlabeled slider to reduce frequency masking in several two instrument scenarios. Satisfaction values were recorded. Results indicate subjects preferred using tools that panned both audio tracks.
ER -