Comparing Separation Quality of Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Nonnegative Matrix Factor 2-D Deconvolution in Audio Source Separation Tasks

Becker JM, Gnann V. Comparing Separation Quality of Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Nonnegative Matrix Factor 2-D Deconvolution in Audio Source Separation Tasks. In: AES Convention 133. Audio Engineering Society; 2012.pp. 8801:1-. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=16543

@inproceedings{Becker2012_16543,
  author = {Becker, Julian M. and Gnann, Volker},
  title = {{Comparing Separation Quality of Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Nonnegative Matrix Factor 2-D Deconvolution in Audio Source Separation Tasks}},
  booktitle = {AES Convention 133},
  pages = {8801:1-},
  year = {2012},
  month = oct,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=16543}
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Comparing Separation Quality of Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Nonnegative Matrix Factor 2-D Deconvolution in Audio Source Separation Tasks
AU  - Becker, Julian M.
AU  - Gnann, Volker
T2  - AES Convention 133
SP  - 1
M1  - Paper 8801
PY  - 2012
DA  - 2012/10/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=16543
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - The Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) is widely used in audio source separation tasks. However, the separation quality of NMF varies a lot depending on the mixture. In this paper we analyze the use of NMF in source separation tasks and show how separation results can be significantly improved by using the Nonnegative Matrix Factor 2D Deconvolution (NMF2D). NMF2D was originally proposed as an extension to the NMF to circumvent the problem of grouping notes, but it is used differently in this paper to improve the separation quality, without taking the problem of grouping notes into account.
ER  -