Comparison of Receiver-Based Concealment and Multiple-Description Coding in an 802.11-Based Wireless Multicast Audio Distribution Network

Purat M, Ritter T. Comparison of Receiver-Based Concealment and Multiple-Description Coding in an 802.11-Based Wireless Multicast Audio Distribution Network. J Audio Eng Soc. 2011;59(4):225-238. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15927

@article{Purat2011_15927,
  author = {Purat, Marcus and Ritter, Tom},
  title = {{Comparison of Receiver-Based Concealment and Multiple-Description Coding in an 802.11-Based Wireless Multicast Audio Distribution Network}},
  journal = {Journal of the Audio Engineering Society},
  volume = {59},
  number = {4},
  pages = {225--238},
  year = {2011},
  month = apr,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15927}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Receiver-Based Concealment and Multiple-Description Coding in an 802.11-Based Wireless Multicast Audio Distribution Network
AU  - Purat, Marcus
AU  - Ritter, Tom
T2  - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
J2  - J. Audio Eng. Soc.
VL  - 59
IS  - 4
SP  - 225
EP  - 238
PY  - 2011
DA  - 2011/04/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15927
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - Because data packets of compressed audio are sometimes lost in wireless distribution networks, some kind of concealment strategy is needed to mitigate the perceived degradation. In selecting a strategy additional bandwidth, processing requirements, and latency must also be considered. Simulations of several strategies based on psychoacoustic models are used to evaluate the audio quality with packet loss. The advantage of a multiple-description system is the graceful degradation of audio quality with increasing packet loss.
ER  -