Evaluating Candidate Sets of Head-Related Transfer Functions for Control of Virtual Source Elevation

Jo H, Park Y, Martens W. Evaluating Candidate Sets of Head-Related Transfer Functions for Control of Virtual Source Elevation. In: AES Conference: 40th International Conference: Spatial Audio: Sense the Sound of Space. Audio Engineering Society; 2010. Paper 8-4. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15551

@inproceedings{Jo2010_15551,
  author = {Jo, Hyun and Park, Youngjin and Martens, William},
  title = {{Evaluating Candidate Sets of Head-Related Transfer Functions for Control of Virtual Source Elevation}},
  booktitle = {AES Conference: 40th International Conference: Spatial Audio: Sense the Sound of Space},
  note = {Paper 8-4},
  year = {2010},
  month = oct,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15551}
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Evaluating Candidate Sets of Head-Related Transfer Functions for Control of Virtual Source Elevation
AU  - Jo, Hyun
AU  - Park, Youngjin
AU  - Martens, William
T2  - AES Conference: 40th International Conference: Spatial Audio: Sense the Sound of Space
M1  - Paper 8-4
PY  - 2010
DA  - 2010/10/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15551
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - The performance of 3 candidate sets of generic Head-Related Transfer Functions (HRTFs) was evaluated in terms of differences in their ability to create distinct elevation angles for virtual sources located on a listener’s median plane. In comparison to directional errors observed when 6 listeners were presented with sources processed using their own individually measured Head-Related Impulse Responses (HRIRs), the errors associated with the 3 alternative candidate sets were tested for seven virtual source target elevation angles on the median plane, spanning the upper hemifield with 30 deg. resolution from front to back. One candidate set was that of a selected subject’s HRIRs that had been modified through a customization procedure designed to provide optimal elevation performance for that subject (which was the selected ‘representative’ subject denoted ‘CH’ in Hwang, et al. [12]). Another candidate set was that formed by taking the mean over the optimized HRIRs of 9 subjects that resulted from that same customization procedure. The third set was generated by taking the mean over the HRIRs of 43 subjects found in the CIPIC database. Performance under identical conditions was also observed for sources convolved with the appropriate individually customized HRIR for each of the 6 listener’s, and also using a familiar KEMAR dataset to serve as a reference. Localization performance was quantified using the 3 error metrics of absolute polar angle error, vertical polar angle error, and front-back confusion rate. Only in terms of front-back confusion rate was performance shown to be inferior for virtual sources processed using the mean of the HRIRs from the CIPIC dataset when compared to either those processed using the representative subject’s customized HRIRs, or using mean of customized HRIRs of 9 subjects. Although the study investigated virtual sources varying in elevation on the median-plane only, the results may generalize to the whole upper hemifield.
ER  -