S. Spors and J. Ahrens, “A Comparison of Wave Field Synthesis and Higher-Order Ambisonics with Respect to Physical Properties and Spatial Sampling,” in Proc. AES Convention 125, Oct. 2008, Paper 7556. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14708
Spors S, Ahrens J. A Comparison of Wave Field Synthesis and Higher-Order Ambisonics with Respect to Physical Properties and Spatial Sampling. In: AES Convention 125. Audio Engineering Society; 2008. Paper 7556. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14708
@inproceedings{Spors2008_14708,
author = {Spors, Sascha and Ahrens, Jens},
title = {{A Comparison of Wave Field Synthesis and Higher-Order Ambisonics with Respect to Physical Properties and Spatial Sampling}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 125},
note = {Paper 7556},
year = {2008},
month = oct,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14708}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - A Comparison of Wave Field Synthesis and Higher-Order Ambisonics with Respect to Physical Properties and Spatial Sampling
AU - Spors, Sascha
AU - Ahrens, Jens
T2 - AES Convention 125
M1 - Paper 7556
PY - 2008
DA - 2008/10/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14708
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Wave field synthesis (WFS) and higher-order Ambisonics (HOA) are two high-resolution spatial sound reproduction techniques aiming at overcoming some of the limitations of stereophonic reproduction techniques. In the past, the theoretical foundations of WFS and HOA have been formulated in a quite different fashion. Although, some work has been published that aims at comparing both approaches their similarities and differences are not well documented. This paper formulates the theory of both approaches in a common framework, highlights the different assumptions made to derive the driving functions and the resulting physical properties of the reproduced wave field. Special attention will be drawn to the consequences of spatial sampling since both approaches differ significantly here.
ER -