J. Breebaart et al., “The Reference Model Architecture for MPEG Spatial Audio Coding,” in Proc. AES Convention 118, May 2005, Paper 6447. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=13163
Breebaart J, Disch S, Faller C, Herre J, Hilpert J, Kjörling K, Myburg F, Purnhagen H, Schuijers E. The Reference Model Architecture for MPEG Spatial Audio Coding. In: AES Convention 118. Audio Engineering Society; 2005. Paper 6447. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=13163
@inproceedings{Breebaart2005_13163,
author = {Breebaart, Jeroen and Disch, Sascha and Faller, Christof and Herre, Jürgen and Hilpert, Johannes and Kjörling, Kristofer and Myburg, Francois and Purnhagen, Heiko and Schuijers, Erik},
title = {{The Reference Model Architecture for MPEG Spatial Audio Coding}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 118},
note = {Paper 6447},
year = {2005},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=13163}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - The Reference Model Architecture for MPEG Spatial Audio Coding
AU - Breebaart, Jeroen
AU - Disch, Sascha
AU - Faller, Christof
AU - Herre, Jürgen
AU - Hilpert, Johannes
AU - Kjörling, Kristofer
AU - Myburg, Francois
AU - Purnhagen, Heiko
AU - Schuijers, Erik
T2 - AES Convention 118
M1 - Paper 6447
PY - 2005
DA - 2005/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=13163
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Recently, technologies for parametric coding of multi-channel audio signals have received wide attention under the name of “Spatial Audio Coding.” In contrast to a fully discrete representation of multi-channel sound, these techniques allow for a backward compatible transmission at bitrates: only slightly higher than common rates currently used for mono / stereo sound. Motivated by these prospects, the MPEG Audio standardization group started a new work item on Spatial Audio Coding. The paper reports on the reference model zero architecture, as it emerges from the MPEG Call for Proposals (CfP) and the subsequent evaluation of the submissions. The architecture combines the strong features of the two submissions to the CfP that were found best in this process.
ER -