H.-G. Kim and T. Sikora, “How Efficient is MPEG-7 for General Sound Recognition?” in Proc. AES Conference: 25th International Conference: Metadata for Audio, Jun. 2004, Paper 5-2. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12814
Kim HG, Sikora T. How Efficient is MPEG-7 for General Sound Recognition? In: AES Conference: 25th International Conference: Metadata for Audio. Audio Engineering Society; 2004. Paper 5-2. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12814
@inproceedings{Kim2004_12814,
author = {Kim, Hyoung-Gook and Sikora, Thomas},
title = {{How Efficient is MPEG-7 for General Sound Recognition?}},
booktitle = {AES Conference: 25th International Conference: Metadata for Audio},
note = {Paper 5-2},
year = {2004},
month = jun,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12814}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - How Efficient is MPEG-7 for General Sound Recognition?
AU - Kim, Hyoung-Gook
AU - Sikora, Thomas
T2 - AES Conference: 25th International Conference: Metadata for Audio
M1 - Paper 5-2
PY - 2004
DA - 2004/06/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12814
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Our challenge is to analyze/classify video sound track content for indexing purposes. To this end we compare the performance of MPEG-7 Audio Spectrum Projection (ASP) features based on several basis decomposition algorithms vs. Mel-scale Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC). For basis decomposition in the feature extraction we evaluate three approaches: Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Independent Component Analysis (ICA), and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF). Audio features are computed from these reduced vectors and are fed into a continuous hidden Markov model (CHMM) classifier. Our conclusion is that established MFCC features yield better performance compared to MPEG-7 ASP in the general sound recognition under practical constraints.
ER -