B. Kapralos, D. Zikovitz, M. R. Jenkin, and L. R. Harris, “Auditory Cues in the Perception of Self Motion,” in Proc. AES Convention 116, May 2004, Paper 6078. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12625
Kapralos B, Zikovitz D, Jenkin MR, Harris LR. Auditory Cues in the Perception of Self Motion. In: AES Convention 116. Audio Engineering Society; 2004. Paper 6078. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12625
@inproceedings{Kapralos2004_12625,
author = {Kapralos, Bill and Zikovitz, Daniel and Jenkin, Michael R. and Harris, Laurence R.},
title = {{Auditory Cues in the Perception of Self Motion}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 116},
note = {Paper 6078},
year = {2004},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12625}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Auditory Cues in the Perception of Self Motion
AU - Kapralos, Bill
AU - Zikovitz, Daniel
AU - Jenkin, Michael R.
AU - Harris, Laurence R.
T2 - AES Convention 116
M1 - Paper 6078
PY - 2004
DA - 2004/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=12625
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Despite its potential importance, few studies have methodically examined the role of auditory cues to the perception of self-motion. Here we describe a series of experiments that investigate the relative roles of various combinations of physical motion and decreasing sound source intensity cues to the perception of linear self-motion. Self-motion was simulated using either (i) physical motion only, (ii) moving audio-cues only, (iii) decreasing intensity cues, and (iv) physical motion coupled with moving audio-cues. In all conditions an over-estimation of self-motion of measures that varied systematically with the simulated acceleration. Of particular interest was that audio cues combined with physical motion cues resulted in more accurate estimates of self-motion than did either audio or physical motion cues in isolation.
ER -