Algorithms for Assessing the Subjectivity of Perceptually Weighted Audible Errors

Hollier MP, Hawksford MJ, Guard DR. Algorithms for Assessing the Subjectivity of Perceptually Weighted Audible Errors. J Audio Eng Soc. 1995;43(12):1041-1045. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=7917

@article{Hollier1995_7917,
  author = {Hollier, Mike P. and Hawksford, Malcolm J. and Guard, David R.},
  title = {{Algorithms for Assessing the Subjectivity of Perceptually Weighted Audible Errors}},
  journal = {Journal of the Audio Engineering Society},
  volume = {43},
  number = {12},
  pages = {1041--1045},
  year = {1995},
  month = dec,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=7917}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Algorithms for Assessing the Subjectivity of Perceptually Weighted Audible Errors
AU  - Hollier, Mike P.
AU  - Hawksford, Malcolm J.
AU  - Guard, David R.
T2  - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
J2  - J. Audio Eng. Soc.
VL  - 43
IS  - 12
SP  - 1041
EP  - 1045
PY  - 1995
DA  - 1995/12/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=7917
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - Auditory modeling is used increasingly to provide an objective prediction of the subjective performance of audio systems. Such techniques typically compare the predicted auditory stimulation of original and processed audio signals to produce an estimate of audible error that can be presented as an error surface. The use of audible error surfaces as a diagnostic tool is investigated and an algorithmic interpretation provided to predict subjective opinion. The applicability of the technique across a range of industries is discussed.
ER  -