H. Schurer, P. Annema, H.-E. de Bree, C. H. Slump, and O. E. Hermann, “Comparison of Two Methods for Measurement of Horn Input Impedance,” in Proc. AES Convention 100, May 1996, Paper 4263. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=7513
Schurer H, Annema P, de Bree HE, Slump CH, Hermann OE. Comparison of Two Methods for Measurement of Horn Input Impedance. In: AES Convention 100. Audio Engineering Society; 1996. Paper 4263. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=7513
@inproceedings{Schurer1996_7513,
author = {Schurer, Hans and Annema, Peter and de Bree, Hans-Elias and Slump, Cornelis H. and Hermann, Otto E.},
title = {{Comparison of Two Methods for Measurement of Horn Input Impedance}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 100},
note = {Paper 4263},
year = {1996},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=7513}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Comparison of Two Methods for Measurement of Horn Input Impedance
AU - Schurer, Hans
AU - Annema, Peter
AU - de Bree, Hans-Elias
AU - Slump, Cornelis H.
AU - Hermann, Otto E.
T2 - AES Convention 100
M1 - Paper 4263
PY - 1996
DA - 1996/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=7513
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Two methods to measure the acoustic input impedance of a horn are compared. The first method measures standing wave patterns in a tube which is loaded by the horn. The input impedance is calculated from the position of the first minimum in the standing wave pattern and the radio of maximum and minimum sound-pressure level in the tube. The second method applied is a direct one. A novel flow sensor is used together with a pressure microphone which are mounted in the throat of the horn. Results from both measurements are compared with simulated models.
ER -