Comparison Between Two Methods for Measuring Acoustical Impedance

Dalmont JP, Kergomard J, Bruneau AM. Comparison Between Two Methods for Measuring Acoustical Impedance. In: AES Convention 82. Audio Engineering Society; 1987. Paper 2454. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=4975

@inproceedings{Dalmont1987_4975,
  author = {Dalmont, J. P. and Kergomard, J. and Bruneau, A. M.},
  title = {{Comparison Between Two Methods for Measuring Acoustical Impedance}},
  booktitle = {AES Convention 82},
  note = {Paper 2454},
  year = {1987},
  month = mar,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=4975}
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Comparison Between Two Methods for Measuring Acoustical Impedance
AU  - Dalmont, J. P.
AU  - Kergomard, J.
AU  - Bruneau, A. M.
T2  - AES Convention 82
M1  - Paper 2454
PY  - 1987
DA  - 1987/03/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=4975
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - The first method uses a capillary tube as a source of excitation and a microphone as receptor. In the second method the excitation part is an electrostatic microphone used as a source. Experimental results and theoretical calculations will be compared for several acoustic transmission line systems. Respective preference range and advantages of both systems will be discussed and several examples of applications to musical instruments and control of acoustic resistance and acoustic materials will be given.
ER  -