J. ,. D. B. (. Keele, “An Efficiency Constant Comparison Between Low-Frequency Horns and Direct-Radiators,” in Proc. AES Convention 54, May 1976, Paper 1127. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=2287
Keele J,DB(. An Efficiency Constant Comparison Between Low-Frequency Horns and Direct-Radiators. In: AES Convention 54. Audio Engineering Society; 1976. Paper 1127. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=2287
@inproceedings{Keele1976_2287,
author = {Keele, Jr., D. B. (Don)},
title = {{An Efficiency Constant Comparison Between Low-Frequency Horns and Direct-Radiators}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 54},
note = {Paper 1127},
year = {1976},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=2287}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - An Efficiency Constant Comparison Between Low-Frequency Horns and Direct-Radiators
AU - Keele, Jr., D. B. (Don)
T2 - AES Convention 54
M1 - Paper 1127
PY - 1976
DA - 1976/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=2287
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Evaluation of the efficiency constant for exponential horns reveals that the horn is quite wasteful in its use of enclosed volume when compared to direct-radiator systems. The main advantage of horns lies in the realizability of rather high efficiencies in the 10% to 40% range which is beyond the capabilities of most direct radiators. Use of direct radiators in arrays increases the low frequency efficiency but not without a decrease of high frequency bandwidth. The areas discussed in this paper are illustrated by comparative experimental measurements on three low frequency systems: 1) A dual driver front loaded folded horn, 2) a single driver direct radiator vented-box system, and 3) a four-driver vented-box system consisting of a 2x2 array of a single driver system of item #2.
ER -