Comparison of different techniques for recording and postproduction using main-microphone arrays for binaural reproduction.

Dillier J, Järveläinen H. Comparison of different techniques for recording and postproduction using main-microphone arrays for binaural reproduction. In: AES Convention 151. Audio Engineering Society; 2021. Paper 10517. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=21481

@inproceedings{Dillier2021_21481,
  author = {Dillier, Josua and Järveläinen, Hanna},
  title = {{Comparison of different techniques for recording and postproduction using main-microphone arrays for binaural reproduction.}},
  booktitle = {AES Convention 151},
  note = {Paper 10517},
  year = {2021},
  month = oct,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=21481}
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Comparison of different techniques for recording and postproduction using main-microphone arrays for binaural reproduction.
AU  - Dillier, Josua
AU  - Järveläinen, Hanna
T2  - AES Convention 151
M1  - Paper 10517
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/10/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=21481
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - We present a subjective evaluation of six 3D main-microphone techniques for three-dimensional binaural music production. Forty-seven subjects participated in the survey, listening on headphones. Results show a subjective preference for ESMA-3D, followed by Decca tree with height, of the included 3D arrays. However, the dummy head and a stereo AB microphone performed as well than any of the arrays for the general preference, timbre and envelopment. Though not implemented for this study, our workflow allows the possibility to include individualized HRTF's and head-tracking; their impact will be considered in a future study.
ER  -