W. Howie, D. Martin, T. Kamekawa, J. Kelly, and R. King, “Comparing immersive sound capture techniques optimized for acoustic music recording through binaural reproduction,” in Proc. AES Conference: 2020 AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (August 2020), Aug. 2020, Paper 10455. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=21132
Howie W, Martin D, Kamekawa T, Kelly J, King R. Comparing immersive sound capture techniques optimized for acoustic music recording through binaural reproduction. In: AES Conference: 2020 AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (August 2020). Audio Engineering Society; 2020. Paper 10455. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=21132
@inproceedings{Howie2020_21132,
author = {Howie, Will and Martin, Dennis and Kamekawa, Toru and Kelly, Jack and King, Richard},
title = {{Comparing immersive sound capture techniques optimized for acoustic music recording through binaural reproduction}},
booktitle = {AES Conference: 2020 AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (August 2020)},
note = {Paper 10455},
year = {2020},
month = aug,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=21132}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Comparing immersive sound capture techniques optimized for acoustic music recording through binaural reproduction
AU - Howie, Will
AU - Martin, Dennis
AU - Kamekawa, Toru
AU - Kelly, Jack
AU - King, Richard
T2 - AES Conference: 2020 AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (August 2020)
M1 - Paper 10455
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/08/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=21132
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - A study was undertaken to compare three immersive sound capture techniques optimized for acoustic music recording, within the context of binaural audio reproduction. 3D audio stimuli derived from 9-channel (4+5+0) recordings of a solo piano were binaurally rendered and presented to listeners over headphones. Subjects compared these stimuli in terms of several salient perceptual auditory attributes. Results of the double-blind listening test found no significant differences between two of the sound capture techniques, “spaced” and “near-coincident,” for the perceptual auditory attributes “envelopment,” “naturalness of sound scene,” and “naturalness of timbre.” The spaced technique, however, was shown to create a larger virtual image of the sound source than the near-coincident technique. The coincident technique was found to create an immersive sound scene that occupies a different perceptual space from the other two techniques, delivering less envelopment and naturalness.
ER -