D. I. Quiroz Orozco and D. Martin, “Exploratory Research into the Suitability of Various 3D Input Devices for an Immersive Mixing Task,” in Proc. AES Convention 147, Oct. 2019, Paper 10294. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=20667
Quiroz Orozco DI, Martin D. Exploratory Research into the Suitability of Various 3D Input Devices for an Immersive Mixing Task. In: AES Convention 147. Audio Engineering Society; 2019. Paper 10294. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=20667
@inproceedings{QuirozOrozco2019_20667,
author = {Quiroz Orozco, Diego I and Martin, Denis},
title = {{Exploratory Research into the Suitability of Various 3D Input Devices for an Immersive Mixing Task}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 147},
note = {Paper 10294},
year = {2019},
month = oct,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=20667}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Exploratory Research into the Suitability of Various 3D Input Devices for an Immersive Mixing Task
AU - Quiroz Orozco, Diego I
AU - Martin, Denis
T2 - AES Convention 147
M1 - Paper 10294
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/10/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=20667
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - This study evaluates the suitability of one 2D (mouse and fader) and three 3D (Leap Motion, Space Mouse, Novint Falcon) input devices for an immersive mixing task. A test, in which subjects were asked to pan a monophonic sound object (probe) to the location of a pink noise burst (target), was conducted in a custom 3D loudspeaker array. The objectives were to determine how quickly the subjects were able to perform the task using each input device, which of the four was most appropriate for the task, and which was most preferred overall. Results show significant differences in response time between 2D and 3D input devices. Furthermore, it was found that localization blur had a significant influence over the subject’s response time, as well as “corner” locations.
ER -