K. Young, G. Kearney, and A. I. Tew, “Acoustic Validation of a BEM-Suitable 3D Mesh Model of KEMAR,” in Proc. AES Conference: 2018 AES International Conference on Spatial Reproduction - Aesthetics and Science, Jul. 2018, Paper EB2-9. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19662
Young K, Kearney G, Tew AI. Acoustic Validation of a BEM-Suitable 3D Mesh Model of KEMAR. In: AES Conference: 2018 AES International Conference on Spatial Reproduction - Aesthetics and Science. Audio Engineering Society; 2018. Paper EB2-9. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19662
@inproceedings{Young2018_19662,
author = {Young, Kat and Kearney, Gavin and Tew, Anthony I.},
title = {{Acoustic Validation of a BEM-Suitable 3D Mesh Model of KEMAR}},
booktitle = {AES Conference: 2018 AES International Conference on Spatial Reproduction - Aesthetics and Science},
note = {Paper EB2-9},
year = {2018},
month = jul,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19662}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Acoustic Validation of a BEM-Suitable 3D Mesh Model of KEMAR
AU - Young, Kat
AU - Kearney, Gavin
AU - Tew, Anthony I.
T2 - AES Conference: 2018 AES International Conference on Spatial Reproduction - Aesthetics and Science
M1 - Paper EB2-9
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/07/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19662
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Binaural audio research frequently employs head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). However, acoustic measure- ment of large numbers of HRTFs can be impractical. An alternative is boundary element method (BEM) simulation using 3D meshes. This paper describes the acoustic validation of a 3D mesh of KEMAR, previously validated against the manufacturer’s CAD file. Differences between acoustic and simulated binaural cues were analysed for consistency. After compensating for systematic errors, the mean difference in interaural time difference was 23.96 µs. The mean differences in monaural and interaural spectral content were 1.92 dB and 2.42 dB, respectively. It is concluded that the mesh is suitable for BEM simulations below 20 kHz, provided that just-noticeable perceptual differences are acceptable, and should prove useful in a variety of research applications.
ER -