N. Zacharov, C. Volk, and T. Stegenborg-Andersen, “Comparison of Hedonic and Quality Rating Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of High- and Intermediate Quality Stimuli,” in Proc. AES Convention 143, Oct. 2017, Paper 9879. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19276
Zacharov N, Volk C, Stegenborg-Andersen T. Comparison of Hedonic and Quality Rating Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of High- and Intermediate Quality Stimuli. In: AES Convention 143. Audio Engineering Society; 2017. Paper 9879. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19276
@inproceedings{Zacharov2017_19276,
author = {Zacharov, Nick and Volk, Christer and Stegenborg-Andersen, Tore},
title = {{Comparison of Hedonic and Quality Rating Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of High- and Intermediate Quality Stimuli}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 143},
note = {Paper 9879},
year = {2017},
month = oct,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19276}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Comparison of Hedonic and Quality Rating Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of High- and Intermediate Quality Stimuli
AU - Zacharov, Nick
AU - Volk, Christer
AU - Stegenborg-Andersen, Tore
T2 - AES Convention 143
M1 - Paper 9879
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/10/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=19276
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - In this study four rating scales for perceptual evaluation of Preference were compared: 9-point hedonic, Continuous Quality Scale (CQS) (e.g., used in ITU-R BS.1534-3 [1], “MUSHRA”), Labelled Hedonic Scale (LHS) [2], and a modified version of the LHS. The CQS was tested in three configurations to study the role and impact of the reference and anchor stimuli, namely: A full MUSHRA test with anchors and references, a test without references, and a test with neither references nor anchors. The six test configurations were tested with two groups of AAC codec qualities: High and Intermediate quality ranges. Results showed that the largest difference in scale usage were caused by having a declared reference, but also that the scale range usage is not strongly related to stimuli discrimination power.
ER -