N. Schinkel-Bielefeld, “Audio Quality Evaluation in MUSHRA Tests–Influencesbetween Loop Setting and a Listeners’ Ratings,” in Proc. AES Convention 142, May 2017, Paper 9779. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=18655
Schinkel-Bielefeld N. Audio Quality Evaluation in MUSHRA Tests–Influencesbetween Loop Setting and a Listeners’ Ratings. In: AES Convention 142. Audio Engineering Society; 2017. Paper 9779. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=18655
@inproceedings{SchinkelBielefeld2017_18655,
author = {Schinkel-Bielefeld, Nadja},
title = {{Audio Quality Evaluation in MUSHRA Tests–Influencesbetween Loop Setting and a Listeners’ Ratings}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 142},
note = {Paper 9779},
year = {2017},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=18655}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Audio Quality Evaluation in MUSHRA Tests–Influencesbetween Loop Setting and a Listeners’ Ratings
AU - Schinkel-Bielefeld, Nadja
T2 - AES Convention 142
M1 - Paper 9779
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=18655
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - In many listening tests for audio quality evaluation the listeners have the possibility to set loops, meaning they can focus on a smaller part of the audio signal and listen to that repeatedly. In previous papers we already showed that experienced listeners set more loops and that learning to set loops increases the ability of the listener to perceive artifacts. Now we analyze to what extent these loops chosen by the listener vary from listener to listener and whether the ratings are influenced by the choice of loops of the listener. We show that—depending on the stimulus—listeners who set different loops may also rate significantly different.
ER -