A. Pearce, T. Brookes, and M. Dewhirst, “Validation of Experimental Methods to Record Stimuli for Microphone Comparisons,” in Proc. AES Convention 139, Oct. 2015, Paper 9385. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17942
Pearce A, Brookes T, Dewhirst M. Validation of Experimental Methods to Record Stimuli for Microphone Comparisons. In: AES Convention 139. Audio Engineering Society; 2015. Paper 9385. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17942
@inproceedings{Pearce2015_17942,
author = {Pearce, Andy and Brookes, Tim and Dewhirst, Martin},
title = {{Validation of Experimental Methods to Record Stimuli for Microphone Comparisons}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 139},
note = {Paper 9385},
year = {2015},
month = oct,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17942}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Validation of Experimental Methods to Record Stimuli for Microphone Comparisons
AU - Pearce, Andy
AU - Brookes, Tim
AU - Dewhirst, Martin
T2 - AES Convention 139
M1 - Paper 9385
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/10/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=17942
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - Test recordings can facilitate evaluation of a microphone's characteristics but there is currently no standard or experimentally validated method for making recordings to compare the perceptual characteristics of microphones. This paper evaluates previously used recording methods, concluding that, of these, the most appropriate approach is to record multiple microphones simultaneously. However, perceived differences between recordings made with microphones in a multi-microphone array might be due to (i) the characteristics of the microphones and/or (ii) the different locations of the microphones. Listening tests determined the maximum acceptable size of a multi-microphone array to be 150 mm in diameter, but the diameter must be reduced to no more than 100 mm if the microphones to be compared are perceptually very similar.
ER -