Comparison of Objective Assessment Methods for Intelligibility and Quality of Speech

Ramirez JP, Raake A. Comparison of Objective Assessment Methods for Intelligibility and Quality of Speech. In: AES Convention 127. Audio Engineering Society; 2009. Paper 7821. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15017

@inproceedings{Ramirez2009_15017,
  author = {Ramirez, Juan-Pablo and Raake, Alexander},
  title = {{Comparison of Objective Assessment Methods for Intelligibility and Quality of Speech}},
  booktitle = {AES Convention 127},
  note = {Paper 7821},
  year = {2009},
  month = oct,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15017}
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Comparison of Objective Assessment Methods for Intelligibility and Quality of Speech
AU  - Ramirez, Juan-Pablo
AU  - Raake, Alexander
T2  - AES Convention 127
M1  - Paper 7821
PY  - 2009
DA  - 2009/10/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15017
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - Subjective rating of the quality of speech in narrow-band telecommunication is parametrically assessed by the so-called E-model [1]. Intelligibility of the speech signal transmitted has a significant impact on the opinion of users [2]. The Speech Intelligibility Index [3] quantifies the amount of speech perceptual features available to the listener in conditions with background noise and linear frequency distortion. It has shown to be highly correlated with subjective speech recognition performance. This paper proposes a comparison between both models. It refers to, and details, improvements towards the modeling of quality in wide-band transmission [4], [5].
ER  -