A. Dobrucki, S. Maleczek, and M. Kin, “Subjective and Objective Evaluation of the Acoustic Vacuum-Tube Amplifiers,” in Proc. AES Convention 126, May 2009, Paper 7806. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15002
Dobrucki A, Maleczek S, Kin M. Subjective and Objective Evaluation of the Acoustic Vacuum-Tube Amplifiers. In: AES Convention 126. Audio Engineering Society; 2009. Paper 7806. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15002
@inproceedings{Dobrucki2009_15002,
author = {Dobrucki, Andrzej and Maleczek, Stanislaw and Kin, Maurycy},
title = {{Subjective and Objective Evaluation of the Acoustic Vacuum-Tube Amplifiers}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 126},
note = {Paper 7806},
year = {2009},
month = may,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15002}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Subjective and Objective Evaluation of the Acoustic Vacuum-Tube Amplifiers
AU - Dobrucki, Andrzej
AU - Maleczek, Stanislaw
AU - Kin, Maurycy
T2 - AES Convention 126
M1 - Paper 7806
PY - 2009
DA - 2009/05/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15002
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - The subjective and objective evaluation of five high-quality vacuum-tube audio power amplifiers is presented in the paper. As the reference, a professional transistor amplifier has been used. The subjective evaluation has been done by a team of judges, as well as using a computer-based psychoacoustic model in accordance with PAQM protocol. The amplifers’ sound quality assessed by the listeners is consistent with the one evaluated with the use of the psychoacoustic model. It was found that the best sound quality is obtained by vacuum-tube amplifiers, the worse – by the reference amplifier. The results of subjective evaluation are inconsistent with quality assessed by measurement of objective parameters: all amplifiers have comparable quality but transistor amplifier is the best one due to the lowest THD+N level.
ER -