B. Fazenda and M. Wankling, “Optimal Modal Spacing and Density for Critical Listening,” in Proc. AES Convention 125, Oct. 2008, Paper 7584. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14736
Fazenda B, Wankling M. Optimal Modal Spacing and Density for Critical Listening. In: AES Convention 125. Audio Engineering Society; 2008. Paper 7584. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14736
@inproceedings{Fazenda2008_14736,
author = {Fazenda, Bruno and Wankling, Matthew},
title = {{Optimal Modal Spacing and Density for Critical Listening}},
booktitle = {AES Convention 125},
note = {Paper 7584},
year = {2008},
month = oct,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14736}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - Optimal Modal Spacing and Density for Critical Listening
AU - Fazenda, Bruno
AU - Wankling, Matthew
T2 - AES Convention 125
M1 - Paper 7584
PY - 2008
DA - 2008/10/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=14736
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - This paper presents a study on the subjective effects of modal spacing and density. These are measures often used as indicators to define particular aspect ratios and source positions to avoid low frequency reproduction problems in rooms. These indicators imply a given modal spacing leading to a supposedly less problematic response for the listener. An investigation into this topic shows that subjects can identify an optimal spacing between two resonances associated with a reduction of the overall decay. Further work to define a subjective counterpart to the Schroeder Frequency has revealed that an increase in density may not always lead to an improvement, as interaction between mode-shapes results in serious degradation of the stimulus, which is detectable by listeners.
ER -