Comparison between In-situ Recordings and Auralizations

Nijs L, Rindel JH, Saher K. Comparison between In-situ Recordings and Auralizations. In: AES Convention 120. Audio Engineering Society; 2006. Paper 6744. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=13548

@inproceedings{Nijs2006_13548,
  author = {Nijs, Lau and Rindel, Jens Holger and Saher, Konca},
  title = {{Comparison between In-situ Recordings and Auralizations}},
  booktitle = {AES Convention 120},
  note = {Paper 6744},
  year = {2006},
  month = may,
  publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
  url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=13548}
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Comparison between In-situ Recordings and Auralizations
AU  - Nijs, Lau
AU  - Rindel, Jens Holger
AU  - Saher, Konca
T2  - AES Convention 120
M1  - Paper 6744
PY  - 2006
DA  - 2006/05/06
UR  - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=13548
PB  - Audio Engineering Society
LA  - en
AB  - The doctoral research of ‘Prediction and Assessment of Acoustical Quality in Living-rooms for People with Intellectual Disabilities’ in Delft University of Technology investigates, among other issues, the applicability and verification of auralization as a quality assessment tool in acoustical-architectural design. This paper deals with comparison between binaural in-situ recordings and auralizations obtained from computer simulations. Listening tests and questionnaires were prepared from auralizations to compare with the reference binaural recordings. The difficulties in evaluation of auralization quality are discussed. The results indicate that although auralizations and binaural recordings evoke different aural perception auralization is a strong tool to assess the acoustical environment before the space is built. Two commercial programs are used for the auralizations. (ODEON and CATT-Acoustics)
ER  -