M. Senova, K. McAnally, and R. Martin, “A Psychophysical Investigation of the Frequency-warping Coefficient (Lambda),” in Proc. AES Conference: 22nd International Conference: Virtual, Synthetic, and Entertainment Audio, Jun. 2002, Paper 000219. [Online]. Available: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=11155
Senova M, McAnally K, Martin R. A Psychophysical Investigation of the Frequency-warping Coefficient (Lambda). In: AES Conference: 22nd International Conference: Virtual, Synthetic, and Entertainment Audio. Audio Engineering Society; 2002. Paper 000219. Available from: https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=11155
@inproceedings{Senova2002_11155,
author = {Senova, Melis and McAnally, Ken and Martin, Russell},
title = {{A Psychophysical Investigation of the Frequency-warping Coefficient (Lambda)}},
booktitle = {AES Conference: 22nd International Conference: Virtual, Synthetic, and Entertainment Audio},
note = {Paper 000219},
year = {2002},
month = jun,
publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
url = {https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=11155}
}
TY - CPAPER
TI - A Psychophysical Investigation of the Frequency-warping Coefficient (Lambda)
AU - Senova, Melis
AU - McAnally, Ken
AU - Martin, Russell
T2 - AES Conference: 22nd International Conference: Virtual, Synthetic, and Entertainment Audio
M1 - Paper 000219
PY - 2002
DA - 2002/06/06
UR - https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=11155
PB - Audio Engineering Society
LA - en
AB - The effect of varying the frequency-warping coefficient (lambda) on localisation and discrimination performance was investigated in two experiments. Cochlear modeling was also conducted to investigate the difference between cochlear output for warped and linear frequency stimuli. Both methods suggest that lambda values greater than 0.65 are not optimal for auditory applications. The optimal lambda values found using these methods (0.47, 0.55 and 0.24 for localisation, discrimination and cochlear modeling, respectively) are lower than the value that best fits the Bark scale (0.77). It is recommended that optimal lambda values be determined by psychophysical evaluation.
ER -