|
PAPERS |
|
Subjective Investigations of Inverse Filtering
(PDF-469K) |
|
|
Scott G. Norcross, Gilbert A. Soulodre, and Michel C. Lavoie |
1003 |
|
Much of the research on inverse filtering to correct room or loudspeaker
irregularities assumes (without confirmation) that such techniques will
improve the subjective listening experience. When this assumption is
carefully tested, surprisingly, many techniques actually degrade overall
audio quality rather than improve it. Two kinds of inverse filtering
were tested: time-domain least squares and frequency deconvolution. Some
additional techniques avoided perceptual artifacts but with an
inconsistent amount of improvement. |
|
|
Comment on this paper
|
|
| |
|
Analysis of a Folded Acoustic Horn
(PDF-792K) |
|
|
Andrew Bright, Keith Holland, and Frank J. Fahy |
1029 |
|
Advanced analysis techniques, such as the boundary-element method (BEM),
show that a folded horn can be represented by a one-parameter model at
low frequencies. Such a model is able to reproduce the throat and
transfer impedances as well as the pressure response with high accuracy
below 300 Hz. At higher frequencies a more complex model is required.
Although the BEM method can contribute to understanding low-frequency
folded horns, it remains a complex analysis technique requiring
specialized skills. |
|
|
Comment on this paper
|
|
| |
|
The Distributed Edge Dipole (DED) Model for Cabinet Diffraction Effects
(PDF-1.0MB) |
|
|
M. Urban, C. Heil, C. Pignon, C. Combet, and P. Bauman |
1043 |
|
A simple model, called distributed edge dipole, is proposed to explain
the effects of cabinet edge diffraction on the radiated sound from a
direct-radiating loudspeaker when mounted in an enclosure. In
comparison to two other techniques, the proposed model more accurately
predicts measurements of a thin circular baffle over 50 to 1000 Hz and
over a wide angular range from 0 to180 degrees. More specifically, the
improvements were obtained in the boundary region between the forward
and backward directions. |
|
|
Comment on this paper
|
|
| |
|
COMMUNICATIONS |
|
Subjective Loudspeaker Testing for Accuracy
(PDF-123K) |
|
|
David Lloyd ben Yaacov Yehuda Klepper |
1060 |
|
Discussions about subjective loudspeaker preferences often ignore the
need for a rating scale to evaluate accuracy. Preferences and accuracy
are different perceptual qualities. Accuracy relates to the degree to
which a reproduced sound field is subjectively equivalent to a
corresponding live presentation of the same source. There is no proof
that preferences among different individuals will match accuracy. |
|
|
Comment on this communication
|
|
| |
|
STANDARDS AND INFORMATION DOCUMENTS |
|
AES Standards Committee News
(PDF-138K) |
1065 |
|
Microphone measurement
|
|
| |
|
FEATURES |
|
A Symposium on Multichannel Audio for Radio Broadcasters
(PDF-759K) |
1066 |
|
Review of Society's Sustaining Members
(PDF-4.1MB) |
1072 |
|
118th Convention, Barcelona, Call for Papers
(PDF-71K) |
1111 |
|
26th Conference, Denver, Call for Papers
(PDF-81K) |
1112 |
| |
|
DEPARTMENTS |
|
Reviews of Acoustical Patents
(PDF-207K) |
1062 |
|
News of the Sections
(PDF-257K) |
1094 |
|
Upcoming Meetings
(PDF-82K) |
1097 |
|
Advertiser Internet Directory
(PDF-82K) |
1097 |
|
Sound Track
(PDF-98K) |
1098 |
|
New Products and Developments
(PDF-97K) |
1100 |
|
Available Literature
(PDF-98K) |
1102 |
|
Membership Information
(PDF-117K) |
1103 |
|
In Memoriam
(PDF-85K) |
1110 |
|
Sections Contacts Directory
(PDF-119K) |
1113 |
|
AES Conventions and Conferences
(PDF-190K) |
1120 |
| |
|
EXTRAS |
|
Cover & Sustaining Members List
(PDF-130K) |
|
|
VIP List & Editorial Staff
(PDF-133K) |
|